Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1259

reference
485-tree-1
name
1259
tree-preservation-order

undefined

485-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.023574 50.882919)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.023460 50.882907,-1.023465 50.882929,-1.023481 50.882949,-1.023506 50.882965,-1.023537 50.882976,-1.023572 50.882980,-1.023608 50.882976,-1.023639 50.882966,-1.023665 50.882951,-1.023682 50.882931,-1.023688 50.882909,-1.023682 50.882886,-1.023667 50.882866,-1.023642 50.882850,-1.023610 50.882840,-1.023575 50.882836,-1.023540 50.882839,-1.023508 50.882849,-1.023483 50.882865,-1.023466 50.882885,-1.023460 50.882907)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL